[OSM-talk] First OpenGeoDB Import is done
Martin Simon
grenzdebil at gmail.com
Sat Jan 19 22:06:18 GMT 2008
Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2008 21:56:16 schrieb Sven Anders:
> Hi,
> today from 17:16 UTC to 20:53 UTC OpenGeoDB was imported to OpenStreetMap.
>
> Please have a look at the newly created data. I hope you enjoy the work. If
> there is corrupted data, please reporte soon. I have made a backup and hope
> that I could fix it.
>
> There was a problem with a upload of some relations, so the relation part
> is not complete until now. I will fix it soon (=in the next month).
>
> More Information about the import and comments can be found/added to the
> wiki-page:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/User:OpenGeoDB
>
> I want to make more synchronisation between OpenGeoDB and OSM later.
>
> Best Regards
> Sven Anders
Hi Sven!
I checked my surroundings (~50.7/7.1) and noticed Bad Honnef, Rheinbach,
Königswinter, Alfter, Unkel and Rheinbreitbach being updated by the OpenGeoDB
Bot.
Wachtberg was newly added and did'nt exist before. :-)
The bot also added a placemark for the Rhein-Sieg-Kreis .
The city of Bonn now exists twice - the old placemark was updated by the bot
and also a new one was created(at the location stored in OpenGeoDB).
Both contain OpenGeoDB data, but the data differs(is_in, auto_update...).
Meckenheim also has two placemarks now, maybe because OpenGeoDB knows it
as "Meckenheim, Rheinland".
However, in this case the old placemark called "Meckenheim" remained
untouched.
I think the official name is just "Meckenheim" and should be kept.
What can I do about this(Bonn and Meckenheim) without breaking something?
-Martin
More information about the talk
mailing list