[OSM-talk] First OpenGeoDB Import is done

[Jannis Achstetter]

Sven Anders schrieb:
> Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 22:05 schrieb Jannis Achstetter:
>> Rob Reid schrieb:
>>> Sven Anders wrote the following on 20/01/2008 09:56:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> today from 17:16 UTC to 20:53 UTC OpenGeoDB was imported to
>>>> OpenStreetMap.
>>>>
>>>> Please have a look at the newly created data. I hope you enjoy the work.
>>>> If there is corrupted data, please reporte soon. I have made a backup
>>>> and hope that I could fix it.
>>> Just had a look at one of the tiles I was rendering for T at H home as I
>>> noticed a lot of place names overlapping.
>>>
>>> The import seems to have created duplicate nodes with differents tag.
>>>
>>> If you have a look in JOSM  at :
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.9&lon=13.45&zoom=12&layers=0BFT
>>> Validate picks up a stack of 7 duplicate nodes and another stack of 6
>>> duplicate nodes.
>>> If you look at the 6 duplicate nodes there is one node named Powang and
>>> 5 named Oberleiten.
>>> If you look at the 5 Oberleiten nodes they have the same place=hamlet
>>> and population=17 tags, but different is_in and OpenGeoDB:postal_codes
>>> tags.
>>>
>>> Is this what you were expecting to happen?
>> I got pretty much the same here:
>>
>> http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=50.002206784996226&lon=9.055237124779579
>> &zoom=12&layers=B000F000F (Seligenstadt is on the map twice, so is
>> Aschaffenburg and Babenhausen) and here:
>> http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=50.100306186757365&lon=8.714661026671264
>> &zoom=12&layers=B000F000F (Frankfurt am Main and Offenbach)
>>
>> just to mention some places in the region I live in.
>>
>> Shall we all fix them manually (and if: how to do this best so that it
>> won't be overriden / created again on next "update") or will this be
>> reverted (since it really shouldn't stay like this)?
> 
> Please read the FAQ on:
> 
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OpenGeoDB#FAQ
> 
> Only fileds which are found in openGeoDB:auto_update will be overwritten.
> Perhabs we can check this in a personal mail, instead of using the 
> mailinglist?
> 
> Sven

Well, I think this is no longer needed, the issue has resolved and the
names don't show up twice any more. I just wondered why they appeared in
first place since the script should have detected the place-nodes which
are already there.
Thanks for the great effort you put into the project ;)

Jannis

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4768 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080121/59b36c10/attachment.bin>