[OSM-talk] Misclassified roads
claudius.h at gmx.de
Mon Jul 14 14:31:58 BST 2008
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> Well, there was a note on Map Features saying not to do it, but until
>> recently it didn't say what you _should_ do.
> Until recently there was no approved tag to do it. A lot of people
> promoted the idea of just never adding roads without knowing their
> classification, which to many of us wasn't really acceptable (as far as
> I'm concerned, it is better to have a road on the map than not, even if
> you don't have all the information).
> - Steve
> xmpp:steve at nexusuk.org sip:steve at nexusuk.org http://www.nexusuk.org/
> Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence
Just to add some 2 cents from Germany:
highway=unclassified is used for minor roads through
commercial/industrial areas according to our country features
definition. So changing hwy=unclassified to hwy=road on the OSM dataset
in Germany would probably target the revers numbers: 80% correctly
tagged industrial/commercial roads.
More information about the talk