[OSM-talk] path or byway ?

80n 80n80n at gmail.com
Sat Jul 19 01:48:07 BST 2008


On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Alex Mauer <hawke at hawkesnest.net> wrote:

> Frederik Ramm wrote:
> >> For one, byway was never proposed or described or otherwise documented,
> >> but instead just plopped into map features.
> >
> > Just like them darn motorways... nobody ever put them to vote, it's
> > a shame ;-)
>
> Except that motorways were there on the very first rev (ok, second) of
> Map Features.  And they're documented.  And conceptually they're not
> UK-specific.
>
> My gripe is that it was put in there with neither discussion nor
> description; I never mentioned anything about voting.
>
> > There are probably a few more millions who know what a byway is.
> > In contrast to the generic term "path", a byway is something very
> > specific in the UK because it has a legal meaning.
>

> You are aware that the OSM definitions of things and the UK legal
> definitions of things are not always the same, right?


In the case of the OSM definition of highway=byway, it corresponds exactly
to the UK definition of a byway (or more precisely Byway Open to All
Traffic).

If it doesn't float your boat (pun intended) then don't use it.

80n



>
>
> -Alex Mauer "hawke"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080719/394acbf0/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list