[OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
openstreetmap at coutiere.com
Mon Jul 28 18:21:23 BST 2008
If things are clear, and if there is a consensus about using this Karlsruhe schema, let's have a vote on it.
This will make things easier: we would then have a clean situation. This would enable people to enter the data.
We may also adapt the tools then, e.g. create a function in JOSM that "explodes" a way by creating parallel ways (for each continuous segment) with pre-filled tags (street names, and so on) so that entering data is easy enough.
----- Mail Original -----
De: "Robert (Jamie) Munro" <rjmunro at arjam.net>
À: "Talk Openstreetmap" <talk at openstreetmap.org>
Envoyé: Lundi 28 Juillet 2008 17:48:54 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Frederik Ramm wrote:
|> I really have a problem with this 'way' linking address nodes in the
|> Karlsruhe schema. We know that the relation has been created for that.
|> This 'way' is just here because some people do not know (or don't want
|> to know) how to use relations in the editors.
| Then use a relation instead. It's a free world ;-)
No, it's definitely a way, because the houses are spread along the
feature. If there was a node for every house, they should be related.
Robert (Jamie) Munro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk