[OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion

Charlie Echo openstreetmap at coutiere.com
Mon Jul 28 18:21:23 BST 2008


If things are clear, and if there is a consensus about using this Karlsruhe schema, let's have a vote on it.

This will make things easier: we would then have a clean situation. This would enable people to enter the data.
We may also adapt the tools then, e.g. create a function in JOSM that "explodes" a way by creating parallel ways (for each continuous segment) with pre-filled tags (street names, and so on) so that entering data is easy enough.

Charlie Echo


----- Mail Original -----
De: "Robert (Jamie) Munro" <rjmunro at arjam.net>
À: "Talk Openstreetmap" <talk at openstreetmap.org>
Envoyé: Lundi 28 Juillet 2008 17:48:54 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frederik Ramm wrote:
| Hi,
|
|> I really have a problem with this 'way' linking address nodes in the
|> Karlsruhe schema.  We know that the relation has been created for that.
|> This 'way' is just here because some people do not know (or don't want
|> to know) how to use relations in the editors.
|
| Then use a relation instead. It's a free world ;-)

No, it's definitely a way, because the houses are spread along the
feature. If there was a node for every house, they should be related.

Robert (Jamie) Munro


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiN6mUACgkQz+aYVHdncI0EoACghK+VZC1Szdr4AHY0ZcHz1ivX
QaAAnjrB7BjRoNpFigfvAacnc2+6WBIU
=41Of
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk




More information about the talk mailing list