[OSM-talk] Why OpenStreetMap is not Wikipedia
Fabrizio Giudici
fabrizio.giudici at tidalwave.it
Tue Jul 29 06:24:04 BST 2008
On Jul 29, 2008, at 0:21 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> I believe that some people are very quick to simply transfer "lessons
> learned" from Wikipedia onto OSM, sometimes without properly taking
> into
> account that while there are similarities, there are also lots of
> differences.
There's another difference, which is quite important (to me at least).
Wikipedia collects knowledge in general and a great deal of this
knowledge (if not most of it) is partly subjective; in the end, the
good faith of its contributors and the existence of a mechanism to
verify it is important. Furthermore, there is stuff where the
"objective truth" doesn't exist at all - all of this bring up the
point of how much one trust in Wikipedia, if you prefer such an
approach or the traditional one with an editor, a board of
controllers, etc... On the contrary, OSM is documenting mostly factual
data based on empirical observation (the GPS tracks). Yes, there are
the boundary controversies etc, but fortunately they involve only a
part of the world. Summing up, there are no strong problems of trust
in OSM, while there are in Wikipedia, IMHO.
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
Fabrizio.Giudici at tidalwave.it - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
More information about the talk
mailing list