[OSM-talk] [tagging] Approved: path, designated. Rejected: *way deprecation
Karl Eichwalder
ke at gnu.franken.de
Mon Jun 2 21:10:20 BST 2008
Alex Mauer schrieb:
> The access restrictions on the road ("no bicycles if there is an
> accompanying cycle route") don't affect the access on the cycle route
> itself. Obviously legality of use by other modes of transportation will
> vary by jurisdiction (In some places cycleway implies "moped=yes", while
> in others it implies "moped=no"). But I think it's fair to say that in
> all jurisdictions, highway=cycleway will imply bicycle=designated.
Probably. And what's the equivalent if you want to use the path
notation? I can think about different possibilities. Here, using
the path would be mandatory for cyclists:
highway=path
cycleway=yes
or here, it is physically possible, but not mandatory:
highway=path
bicycle=yes
For clarity, I'd propose to add the traffic (road) sign, where
available.
--
Karl Eichwalder
More information about the talk
mailing list