[OSM-talk] Nested areas

[Robert Vollmert]

On Jun 6, 2008, at 09:09, spaetz wrote:
> But if you tag a river universally over quite a bit with layer=-1  
> just for the fun of it, as was in the original example, then this  
> looks weird. And osmarender is right to make it look weird, isn't it?

I think this can be correct, if say a river runs in a river bed that's  
dug into to the landscape. So the surface of the river is always say  
2m below the surrounding areas. Bridges over the river are flat.

Cheers
Robert