[OSM-talk] [tagging] noname streets

[80n]

noname=yes seems like a perfectly good solution.  Why do you think it might
not be optimal?

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:25 AM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:

> I didn't find much on the wiki, has anyone looked at defining streets
> without names?
>
> I'd like to define some roads that really don't have a name so that
> they drop off the noname map.
>
>        http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/no-names/<http://dev.openstreetmap.org/%7Erandom/no-names/>
>
> I've been adding noname:yes but I can see that might not be optimal.
> Maybe name:__none__. Or something.
>
> Best
>
> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080609/28d05539/attachment.html>