[OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 46, Issue 27

elvin ibbotson elvin.ibbotson at poco.org.uk
Mon Jun 9 14:46:17 BST 2008


>
> From: SteveC <steve at asklater.com>
> Date: 9 June 2008 12:44:49 BDT
> To: 80n <80n80n at gmail.com>
> Cc: OSM Talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] noname streets
>
>
> coz it makes me think of no=yes
>
> and that would just be silly
>
> On 9 Jun 2008, at 12:43, 80n wrote:
>
>> noname=yes seems like a perfectly good solution.  Why do you think  
>> it might not be optimal?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:25 AM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
>> I didn't find much on the wiki, has anyone looked at defining streets
>> without names?
>>
>> I'd like to define some roads that really don't have a name so that
>> they drop off the noname map.
>>
>>        http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/no-names/
>>
>> I've been adding noname:yes but I can see that might not be optimal.
>> Maybe name:__none__. Or something.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>
> Best
>
> Steve
>
>

Hasn't 80n got a degree in philosophy? If so no=yes might not be too  
much of a problem ;-)

elvin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080609/e65e2668/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list