[OSM-talk] Rendering of tracktype

[Andy Allan]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Sven Geggus
<lists at fuchsschwanzdomain.de> wrote:
> Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>
>> It's because the Mapnik layer aims to be a nice looking map and not one
>> that "has it all".
>
> Despite of this it would IMO be still much mor appropriate to render
> tracktype=grade1 in the same form as highway=service.
>
> If we don't want to have mapnik render different tracks differently we
> should at least have them in the cyclemap!

Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it
as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't
render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle
routes as more important than the difference between tracktypes; ditto
for distinguishing bicycle=yes/no on footpaths and so on.

Cheers,
Andy