[OSM-talk] Relations Proposals for boundary, country and is_in

Knut Arne Bjørndal bob+osm at cakebox.net
Wed Jun 18 14:50:53 BST 2008


"Raphael Studer" <studerap at gmail.com> writes:
> I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Is_In
>
> I've also seen relations with type=nation meaning nearly the same as country.
>
> What's about having only two of them:

I was thinking along these lines when I wrote the Country proposal,
please remove it as an obsolete suggestion and suggest this instead as
it looks much cleaner to me.

Btw: is there a clear procedure on how we make relation usages
standard?

-- 
Knut Arne Bjørndal
aka Bob Kåre
bob+osm at cakebox.net
bobkare at irc




More information about the talk mailing list