[OSM-talk] area_with_holes as alternative to multipolygon relation
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Fri Mar 14 10:35:22 GMT 2008
Hi,
>> True, but since there can only be one circumference of a polygon,
>> could we not specify that if more than one "outer" ways exist in a
>> multipoly relation, these will be merged to make the circumference?
>
> That would be very confusing. I'd expect "outer" and "inner" ways to be
> the same kind of way (closed). Several "outer_part" ways instead of one
> "outer" would be better, but that's still not good: What if an inner way
> is also so long you'd like to split it up?
*Then* we'd have to implement a generic system whereby any of the
outer/inner members can be replaced by relations grouping multiple way
parts, as you said. But if I were to implement solutions for all the
hypothetical problems that I can think of, I'd get nowhere...
> Basically, I think using several open "outer" ways like this is abusing
> the fact that there's just one outer way to start with.
I didn't want to *abuse* the fact. I wanted to use it cleverly to make
things easier for people.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the talk
mailing list