[OSM-talk] Osmxapi returns old data
80n
80n80n at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 11:44:49 GMT 2008
Lars
I think this is all sorted out now. Let me know if you suspect any other
discrepancies.
80n
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Lars Aronsson <lars at aronsson.se> wrote:
> 80n wrote:
>
> > Lars
> > Can you point to a couple of specific instances please so that I can
> > investigate further?
>
> If you try this very narrow region,
>
> wget '
> http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/way[bbox=14.4,58.05,14.6,58.1][note=FIXME<http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/way%5Bbbox=14.4,58.05,14.6,58.1%5D%5Bnote=FIXME>previously unwayed segment]' -O
> mymap.osm
>
> You will get a 3280 bytes in mymap.osm, containing a few small
> untagged ways:
>
> <way id='8173415' timestamp='2005-06-23T02:14:27Z'>
> <way id='8173417' timestamp='2005-06-23T02:14:30Z'>
> <way id='8173419' timestamp='2005-06-23T02:15:30Z'>
> <way id='8212509' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:11:40Z'>
> <way id='8212516' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:12:58Z'>
> <way id='8212518' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:14:36Z'>
> <way id='8212522' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:14:41Z'>
> <way id='8212526' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:15:07Z'>
>
> Swedes will know this area as the ruins of Brahehus, near lake
> Vättern and motorway E4. I mapped this place with line segments
> in my first year of OSM, as shown by the timestamps above. Then
> Osmarender was introduced and the need to tag ways, and then
> someone added "FIXME" tags to old line segments. So just two weeks
> ago I edited these ways, combining them into larger units, adding
> the appropriate tags and removing the "note=FIXME" tags.
>
> When you open mymap.osm with JOSM, you will notice that all ways
> are 2 nodes (a single line segment) and they are not connected,
> but sprinkled out. If you download fresh data from OSM (without
> changing the zoom), you will notice that all FIXME tags are gone,
> and the ways are larger connected units.
>
> The last way in the list above, having id=8212526, still exists,
> but now is now a 4 node way (highway=motorway_link). It was
> tagged "fixme" in the planet.osm dump of 080227, but not in 080305
> or 080312.
>
> At first I thought that 2-node ways that I had removed were
> lingering in osmxapi, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I
> guess the neighboring ways 8212523-8212525 were correctly removed.
> But the way that remained after my combination and tagging,
> 8212526, apparently wasn't modified in osmxapi.
>
>
>
> --
> Lars Aronsson (lars at aronsson.se)
> Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080316/5563d94c/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list