[OSM-talk] Cycle lanes
Mike Collinson
mike at ayeltd.biz
Mon Mar 24 07:48:44 GMT 2008
At 07:32 AM 24/03/2008, Lars Aronsson wrote:
>It's common in Sweden to have wide sidewalks divided into half
>footway, half cycleway. This can happen on either or both sides
>of the street. Should this be tagged as highway=*;cycleway=lane?
>Technically speaking it isn't a lane because it's above the curb.
>
>How can I indicate which (or both) sides of the street it applies
>to? If it's only on one side, how can I indicate this?
>
>The page [[Proposed features/Sidewalk]] proposes sidewalk=right.
>Should this be used for cycleway too? A user comment on that page
>mentions cycleway:right=lane. Is that a common use, that needs to
>be documented?
>
>The page [[Cycleway]] instead talks of lane_left and lane_right.
>
>The same page also mentions the "width" key, but what are some
>useful values for this key? In the case of two wide sidewalks
>that allow bikes, some separating grass, and double street lanes,
>should the width be the total width (in metres) from wall to wall?
As a cyclist currently in Stockholm, I personally draw a separate way and label it highway=cycleway, cycleway=track, foot=yes, surface=paved.
The main rationale for that is that it is a separate track rather than a painted lane division on someone else's road. Sometimes the track is right next to the road, sometimes separated by a grass verge and sometimes it wanders off into the woods.
But my main reason for doing that is safety. I *much* prefer riding these cycleways than on lanes marked on the road and deliberately plan my routes according. Drawing a separate way makes them very obvious on the map using existing tagging. I can also easily see where they change side of a road and if they have sections where they merge into the normal road as a lane or just disappear.
That is my personal opinion, I'm interested it what others think.
Mike
PS Here is a work-in-progress example:
Good: The southbound Sankt Eriksgatan sidewalk cycleway really is a separate track over the bridge and really does abruptly end at Aströmergatan. As a bonus, it is clearly shown as one-way.
Bad: An east-west sidewalk cycleway begins at the corner of Fridhemsgatan and Drottingholmvägen, but is difficult to see because of the rendering.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.33395&lon=18.02934&zoom=17&layers=B0FT
More information about the talk
mailing list