[OSM-talk] [tagging] RFC: railway=incline
Alex Mauer
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Sat Mar 29 18:20:24 GMT 2008
Andy Allan wrote:
> I see you've changed it from railway:incline:traction= to
> railway:traction= - but I still don't understand the need for the
> railway: prefix. Am I missing something obvious? What's wrong with
> just traction= ?
I think it is possible, even likely, that we might want to apply it to
something other than railway, which can share a way with a railway. The
simple/plain traction= would preclude this.
-Alex Mauer "hawke"
More information about the talk
mailing list