[OSM-talk] [tagging] RFC: railway=incline

Alex Mauer hawke at hawkesnest.net
Sat Mar 29 18:20:24 GMT 2008


Andy Allan wrote:

> I see you've changed it from railway:incline:traction= to
> railway:traction= - but I still don't understand the need for the
> railway: prefix. Am I missing something obvious? What's wrong with
> just traction= ?

I think it is possible, even likely, that we might want to apply it to 
something other than railway, which can share a way with a railway.  The 
simple/plain traction= would preclude this.

-Alex Mauer "hawke"





More information about the talk mailing list