[OSM-talk] Wide tracks with cycle access

Andy Robinson (blackadder) blackadderajr at googlemail.com
Thu May 1 11:29:45 BST 2008


Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Sent: 01 May 2008 11:13 AM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Wide tracks with cycle access
>
>Andy Robinson \(blackadder\) wrote:
>
>> Perhaps this is the better way to think about it. I generally don't like
>> subjective tagging, but in this instance giving an opinion about how
>usable
>> a section of way is might be better. If you simplified bike types into
>> "road", "hybrid" and "mtb" then I guess you could reasonably add say
>> suitability_road / suitability_hybrid / suitability_mtb tags, or join
>them
>> together as bicycle_suitability=road|hybrid|mtb and leave out any of the
>> values where you consider its not suitable.
>
>Indeed - and you probably just need one value, given that an MTB can
>use anything a hybrid can, and a hybrid can use anything a road bike
>can. bicycle_minimum maybe.

even better. +1 to that.

Cheers

Andy

>
>cheers
>Richard
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk





More information about the talk mailing list