[OSM-talk] [tagging] Bridge proposal

Raphael Studer studerap at gmail.com
Thu May 15 10:14:44 BST 2008


> Relation should be IN ADDITION to identifying elements that make it up, not as
> a replacement which is what is being proposed.
> Areas provide physical with details that are missing from routes, but also do
> not replace the basic elements such as 'railway and footway' that form part of
> the bridge.

I also understand the relations as additions. The question is more
about additions to what.
As addition to the tags like:

way1: highway=primary, bridge=yes, onway=true
way2: highway=footway, bridge=yes

relation1: type=multiway, way1=middle, way2=left

Or as addition to the tagging scheme:

way1: highway=primary, oneway=true
way2: highway=footway
relation1: type=multiway, bridge=yes, way1=middle, way2=left

Regards,
Raphael




More information about the talk mailing list