[OSM-talk] difference between waterway=canal and waterway=drain
Alex Mauer
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Fri May 16 21:49:38 BST 2008
Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> Presumably that's only called a canal for historical reasons then?
>>
>
> Yes. Is there anything wron with that?
Nope. I was just that I was wondering if it had some reason beyond its
physical characteristics for being tagged as a canal.
On the other hand, it might be better to just not tag it as a canal
(just giving it the relevant name of "Croyden canal" instead) so that
someone expecting a navigable waterway isn't disappointed.
-Alex Mauer "hawke"
More information about the talk
mailing list