[OSM-talk] Unknown road classifications

[Rory McCann]

Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
> I'd vote for complete=no, and rendering it with an arrow on the
> unconnected end of the way. Sometimes,  e.g. if you pass under a bridge,
> but haven't gone back to pass over it, you may have a way with arrows on
> both ends. That is fine. I'd allow and render towards=[name of place],
> but that get's confusing in the 2 ended passing under a bridge case.

I agree, complete=no makes sense. But what should this be applied to? 
Nodes? Ways? I suggest it should be added to a node that's at the end of 
a way to signafy that the way continues alone roughly the same direction 
as it was going. I think it should be rendered as a a few dots in the 
same direction and the same colour and thickness as the original way.

Thoughts?

Rory