[OSM-talk] osmarenderer issues
Robin Paulson
robin.paulson at gmail.com
Sat May 31 09:29:35 BST 2008
2008/5/31 Robert Vollmert <rvollmert-lists at gmx.net>:
> On May 31, 2008, at 02:16, Robin Paulson wrote:
>>
>> the first one shows the area containing a rugby stadium, with the
>> individual stands mapped and tagged as buildings. is there any reason
>> why some of the stands (southern and terraces in particular) appear to
>> be defined by two polygons (there's only one actually drawn there)?
>> there seems to be one which faithfully follows the ways drawn in
>> potlatch, and another which has been 'rounded'.
>
> I believe angles >90 degrees are being rounded, which seems wrong for most
> areas at least. Maybe start rounding at 150 degrees, if at all? Probably
> even for roads, you'd put enough nodes in a bend to have each angle above,
> say, 120 degrees.
ah, that'll be it, thanks.
i think it would be better to enable this rounding on an object-type
basis, rather than on everything. the limits of, for example
buildings, parks, car parks (any property in fact), are almost always
square. roads on the other hand would definitely benefit from the
rounding
More information about the talk
mailing list