[OSM-talk] Proposed Relations

[Andy Allan]

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:15 PM, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net> wrote:

>> I would suggest concentrating on documenting the ones that are in use,
>> such as multipolygons, cycle route relations. Even better is to
>> concentrate on the ones that are in the db and widely consumed
>> by  e.g. a renderer),
>
> Is there any easy way to find what relations fit into the above category?
>
>> e.g. a renderer), then on the ones in the db but not widely consumed
>> (e.g. turn restrictions)
>
> I there any easy way to find what relations fit into the above category?

It's reasonably easy to find out what ones are in use in the db, but
harder to find out which are consumed. Yet still fairly
straightforward detective work for someone with a good knowledge of
OSM.

Frederik, next time we have a discussion group like the one on
relations at SOTM, remind me to video and/or transcribe it :-)

Cheers,
Andy