[OSM-talk] Proposed Relations

Hakan Tandogan hakan at gurkensalat.com
Mon Nov 3 15:08:21 GMT 2008


On Mon, November 3, 2008 14:49, Pieren wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
>
>
> I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
> as a proposal in the wiki. Having a quick look on the european statistics
> about relations in tagwatch ([1]), the most popular relation "is"
> type=boundary (10297), most of them for admin_level=8 (municipalities).
> This is an example of "approved" relation which does not require a
> vote because it's already widely used.

By the way, are relations guaranteed to be ordered? If not, how could one
be sure to stitch all parts of a long border? Do we need a rule like "the
border has to be a unbroken set of ways" like for the coast lines?


Regards,
Hakan

-- 
The key to immortality is first living a life worth remembering...






More information about the talk mailing list