[OSM-talk] Proposed Relations

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

Karl Newman wrote:
>> 2. Make sure the big three editors support ordering. Nobody will notice,
>> nobody has to change what he does. Also, try and get Osmosis and the
>> various mirror services (ROMA, XAPI) to support ordered relations.
>>
> 
> I can confirm that Osmosis already maintains the order of relations.

That's good but in order to allow Osmosis-based database thingies like 
ROMA (at least I believe it uses Osmosis?), one would probably have to 
amend the database input/output code to populate/use a sequence number 
field in the relation_members table!

But don't jump ahead and do something, my idea might still be shot down 
and/or shown to be flawed or useless in some way, I haven't discussed it 
with the others working on 0.6 yet.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"