[OSM-talk] Validator tags

[Patrick Kilian]

Hi,

> Whoops, looks like we are working on the same thing, with same goal and almost 
> the same method
Looks like you want to formalize the note=* thing a bit. Which is a good
think.

I guess the patch could be expanded to not expect a name for
"internal:noname=yes". Alternativly you could exclude the noname issue
from the internal:-namespace and say "ok, we don't need a note there, we
have a specialized tag for that". Obviously I would prefer the later...

If your validator would respect the tags in the validate:-namespace that
would be very cool.



Patrick "Petschge" Kilian