[OSM-talk] Hierarchy of places

David Earl david at frankieandshadow.com
Fri Nov 28 12:09:14 GMT 2008


On 28/11/2008 11:48, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> There aren't that many cities with duplicate/multiple names. So I'd guess a
> wiki page where they are listed and the community decides a stacking order
> would be straightforward enough. Obviously doing it at lower levels this
> approach wouldn't work. Info can then be tagged and used by namefinder?

I take your point, but the general case is not just the namefinder - 
it's also about how large the captions are on renderings and whether 
place A or B gets the caption when the two would overlap.

So we need to know relative importance in general, not just between 
far-apart places with the same names.

Some kind of "importance" tag could do the job, but how we define it in 
a reasonably objective way that could be applied to more than just a few 
special cases is hard, unless we use things like population, local role 
and area, in which case why not tag these things directly.

David





More information about the talk mailing list