[OSM-talk] Tiny island coastline errors
Cartinus
cartinus at xs4all.nl
Sun Nov 30 20:40:07 GMT 2008
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 22:05:31 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Not sure if it was exactly this problem, but it is due to the size. I
> don't know if the word "island" is appropriate, more likely a large
> rock :) Did someone actually get on to the thing to measure it? It's
> certainly way smaller that you can accurately measure with a GPS
> device.
>
> I'm looking for the cause. The bit of code I thought it would be
> doesn't appear to be it after all.
>
> Does it actually make sense to tag such things as coastline anyway?
>
> Have a nice day,
I finally had time to look at this again.
I first thought the error in lake Erie was probably an artefact of the Landsat
pixel size / PGS import process. However it is clearly visible on the Yahoo
Imagery. There it is however slightly bigger than the PGS data suggests. I
stretched the island to match the aerial image and it now has a diameter of
10m in stead of 6m. Lets see if the error is gone tomorrow.
For the error at Cyprus I looked at the OSM data, the Yahoo Imagery and the
next picture on Wikipedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rock.jpg>
My conclusion is that it is probably the white spot in the waves in the middle
of the picture. So I changed the tagging.
I left the error in Estonia alone. As it looks like someone reimported the
Estonian coastline from some source other than PGS.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
More information about the talk
mailing list