[OSM-talk] Motor way links oneway or not

[Lulu-Ann at gmx.de]

> Marc Sch?tz wrote:
> >> Isn't a motorway by definition divided and therefore oneway ?
> > 
> > A motorway yes, but not a motorway_link.
> > 
> >> My opinion is that motorway and motorway_link must both default to
> >> oneway=true, as the bi-directional varieties are non-existent / very
> rare.
> > 
> > Quite the opposite: most motorway_links around here a bidirectional,
> except the small parts where they enter and exit the motorway.
> 
> Then only the small parts that are the actual link should be tagged as 
> motorway_links ;)
> 
> -- 
> Lester Caine - G8HFL

I agree to Marc that motorway links are often bidirectional except the ends where
they run parallel to the motorway, and I really do not want the bidirectional parts to be 
tagged as trunks because that would result in asymetrical green parts in a blue motorway
cloverleafs. I would like to have motorway links without an implied oneway=yes or oneway=no,
but with a rule-checker that points out where the oneway tag is missing.
As the German motorway links belong to the motorway and therefor are part of a motorway relation, I would really be odd to add trunk parts!

bye
Lulu-Ann
-- 
GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry Passion!
http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free/puzzle/6169196