[OSM-talk] Code of conduct for automated (mass-) edits

[Matthias Julius]

"maning sambale" <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> writes:

>>
>> This is all based on positive thinking, assuming that people are
>> basically well-meaning.
> Agree, most mistakes in my area are not vandalism, but just mistakes.
> I know I made many.  Simply informing the mapper the problem is good
> enough.  And sometimes that mapper maybe the most prolific.
>
> This may not be a good analogy, but I often consult wikipedia
> eventhough a lot there are lot of vandalism/crappy articles there.
>
> I believe a code of conduct is sufficient in the spirit and principles of OSM.

... and if it really is not there is still time to think about other
means of "enforcing" compliance with the rules.

Matthias