[OSM-talk] Map Features, maxspeed and maplint
Shaun McDonald
shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk
Fri Oct 10 14:50:55 BST 2008
On 10 Oct 2008, at 14:27, Chris Hill wrote:
> Dermot McNally wrote:
>> 2008/10/10 Chris Hill <chillly809 at yahoo.co.uk>:
>>
>>
>>> Conversions to 0dp is inaccurate, accurate conversions are a mess,
>>> namespacing allows for conflicting values so only an optional
>>> suffix really
>>> makes sense, so this why I use.
>>>
>>
>> Well, maxspeed:mph would also work for your purposes. The only
>> difference is that you have chosen to silently ignore the behaviour
>> documented in Map Features. I'm not convinced by your point about
>> conflicts - in a world where a single field can have, essentially,
>> different data types in it, I think we've already sacrificed any
>> pretence of orderliness.
>>
>> Dermot
>>
>>
> maxspeed:mph only conforms to map features because Shaun amended it
> earlier today!!!!!
>
> [listens for the sound of the voting request email to arrive - hears
> nothing]
>
In my opinion the voting process is broken, as it can potentially vote
in proposals that will break backwards compatibility and require
extensively more complex processing of the data. Take for example:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Status
(I'm wondering if there is a station out there that has all the
railway=platforms mapped, rather than just placing a footpath to the
railway=station node.)
Shaun
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2433 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20081010/f9911e20/attachment.bin>
More information about the talk
mailing list