[OSM-talk] More vandalism
Matias D'Ambrosio
angasule at gmail.com
Mon Oct 13 23:42:32 BST 2008
On Monday 13 October 2008 20:19:38 Nic Roets wrote:
> Hi Frederik,
>
> I'm glad the issue gets to be discussed, as it will show up more and more
> frequently. Clearly we need some conflict resolution rules (similar to
> wikipedia's "3 revert rule"), oversight and dispute resolution. We need to
> strike a balance between giving new users the benefit of the doubt while
> not tying down experienced users with the boring work of explaining
> themselves and revisiting previously mapped locations.
>
> Matias wrote :
> > <generic proposal of banning potlatch> :-P
>
> Or change potlatch so that it will not delete or modify objects last edited
> by other users. Then it would at least be easy to delete anything they did.
>
It would also make it useless. Proper history support would make it easy to
revert someone's changes.
Maybe a 5/10 minute interactive tutorial the first time one uses potlatch
would solve the issue of Iwannaeditnow users. Since anonymous editing is not
allowed, people would only have to do it once, I don't think it would be too
annoying. Of course, implementing this is the issue :-)
> > I think having changesets ... will help alleviate this issue.
>
> Changesets wouldn't do much. According to itoworld, this user had many
> "sessions".
It would help in other cases, though. There is no silver bullet for anything
(well, except for hunting werewolves).
More information about the talk
mailing list