[OSM-talk] barrier=gate, run a script?
Matthias Julius
lists at julius-net.net
Tue Oct 21 19:34:39 BST 2008
Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> writes:
> Map Features is a documentation of what is used, not of what someone
> thinks should be used.
The first paragraph on Map Features says it is "a core recommended
feature set and corresponding tags", and to me a recommendation is
something that should be followed (at least in the view of its
author).
Nothing on Map Features says that it is a list of commonly used tags.
Instead, it is my understanding that there are a couple of people who
decide through voting what to put on Map Features.
>
> There is a rather objective basis for what is used - the planet file.
> There is no objective basis for what "should" be used - everybody has
> their own ideas. These things form slowly; someone documents his idea
> somewhere, others talk about it on the lists or forums, with time it
> gets adopted by many (or not), and there may come a time when you look
> at Map Features and say "hm, this highway=gate is barely used any more,
> let's ditch it", and that's fine. But this is something you do "ex
> post", not "ex ante", or put another way, Map Features is not a
> normative page, it is empirical.
I am not advocating for anyone to just go and delete features. I am
just saying that if there is a process to add features the same
process can be used to remove them.
I also think it is confusing if two equivalent tags are recommended
for the same thing. If by whatever process it is determined that a
new wah of tagging gates is recommended the old tag should point to
the new one with the indication that the recommendation has changed.
>
> We have no mechanism to divide "good" from "bad" ideas. If you start
> putting your ideas about what you think is good and "should" be used on
> Map Features, then I will start putting mine on there as well, and
> everyone else. That's why we don't want to go down this road. (And
> before anyone asks, a vote in which 0.01% of mappers participate does
> not elevate one idea about what is "good" above hundreds of others.)
I agree with you here, but voting seems to be the current practice.
Matthias
More information about the talk
mailing list