[OSM-talk] Ideas for student project on OSM
Matt Amos
zerebubuth at gmail.com
Tue Oct 28 22:35:58 GMT 2008
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Freek <freek_osm at vanwal.nl> wrote:
> I have not seen those (would be interested), but I would guess rectangular
> queries make an equilateral-triangle subdivision inherently less favourable,
> even though the geometry is distorted by the projection
i think it might have been this one... or maybe not... it was a long
time ago :-)
http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?tr_id=736
> (we don't have much
> data near the poles anyway ;-)
this is exactly why an icosahedral decomposition is so good - each
tile in the same level of the tree is very nearly the same projected
area. the quadtile approach (whether using 3395 or 4326) projects to
much smaller areas near the poles than the equator, so wastes valuable
coordinate space and unbalances the tree. if the icosahedron is
oriented correctly (fuller's dymaxion orientation) then several of the
triangular faces are completely filled with ocean and can be omitted.
cheers,
matt
More information about the talk
mailing list