[OSM-talk] New Debugging-Tool: OSM-Inspector
Dave Stubbs
osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk
Thu Oct 30 16:06:45 GMT 2008
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Shaun McDonald
<shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote:
>
> On 30 Oct 2008, at 15:32, Dave Stubbs wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dave Stubbs <osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't tried applying the same script with addr:postcode yet, so I
>>> don't know how it' use compares in the UK, but I doubt it's as
>>> extensive as it hasn't been around as long.
>>>
>>
>> I just tried this and there are only 400 extra nodes added by
>> addr:postcode, about 150 times fewer than for postal_code.
>> My script will process both in future runs.
>
> What about plain old postcode=? how much has that been used?
>
Just the once :-)
post_code adds another 100 nodes, so not much use of that either.
More information about the talk
mailing list