[OSM-talk] mailing list behavior
Lance Dyas
lancelot at inetnebr.com
Mon Sep 1 21:19:20 BST 2008
vegard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:05:56PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:39:33PM -0500, Lance Dyas wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The default responder to public conversation venues
>>> needs to be to just that ...
>>>
>> There's no way OSM could change that default, it's up to your MUA
>> vendor. The buttons you're currently using are "reply" (with an implied
>> "to author") and "reply to all", not "reply (default)" and "reply
>> (alternative)".
>>
>
> Actually, yes and no.
>
> the mailing-list *could* add a reply-to header, to the list-adress. It's
> not a fool-proof method (what if the user also adds one?), but it makes an
> effort, at least, to tell the users that the reply-to should go to the
> list.
>
This works great actually didnt realize that the header wasnt there...
sure enough most of my
lists have a reply to header/go figure.. the odd man out are not more
technically correct they are just
inconvenient on purpose and claiming to be more correct.
More information about the talk
mailing list