[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap routing service
Lambertus
osm at na1400.info
Mon Sep 8 17:08:31 BST 2008
Oh please, I wasn't talking about language.
Lars Aronsson wrote:
> Lambertus wrote:
>
>> Here the dogma 'Don't change the tagging just to get it
>> rendered' applies :-)
>
> That is an absurd proposition. It could lead us to label them as
> "vägklassning=riksväg ; vägbredd=9 meter ; hastighet=90 km/h" and
> we should just ignore the fact that the map of Sweden doesn't get
> rendered at all. I feel like I have been far too pragmatic in my
> first three years of OpenStreetMap.
>
>> I think it would be better to judge the roads on what their
>> function is and try to correlate those roads to the map features
>> page by their description.
>
> It's all very easy. The function is "riksväg".
>
>> But this may well be that perhaps some ways in Sweden have to be
>> reclassified to trunk or that some ways in Norway /Finland
>> should be classified primary, I don't know that.
>
>> There is ofcourse also the chance that Sweden just does not have
>> a road type that fits the trunk type between motorway and
>> primary, however from what I read in other mails it appears that
>> cyclists are allowed on most trunk roads in GB.
>
> There are non-motorway roads where tractors and bicycles are
> disallowed. These are called "motortrafikled" (and "2+1 väg") but
> they are not very common in Sweden. And I don't know if this road
> type is ever indicated on printed maps.
>
>
>
More information about the talk
mailing list