[OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

[Steven te Brinke]

Taking a closer look at the data, there are some strange things indeed. 
However, these are not new, they are already in there several weeks.
I retrieve all routes in the netherlands: 
relation[network=rcn][bbox=2.7984557419334006,50.62642256377723,7.388298070963748,53.954129036190224]

Problems:
- some relations are outside the bbox, for example relation 5881 (at 
least, as far as I can see, I didn't compute the bbox of the relation)
- quite some nodes are missing (they are referenced by ways that are 
returned)
- a few ways do not contain any nodes, for example way 24828122, whereas 
the main api returns two nodes

For now I just ignore these, so it's no problem to me. But if you want 
more information on these problems, I can easily give a list of all 
nodes/ways with the last two problems.

Steven


Lambertus schreef:
> Thanks for the quick action. The amount of data downloaded by the 
> query was significantly more then before so that was already 
> promising. Looking at the data in JOSM showed no sign of crippled 
> roads so that bug appears to be squashed.
>
> However the bbox parameter still does not seem to do what I expect 
> from it (data returning from UK, NL, DE and BE instead of roughly a 
> province in NL). Reversing the parameters gives almost but not exactly 
> the same result:
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 lambertus lambertus 16519465 Sep 11 08:45 data.osm.4 
> (wget 
> http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/relation[network=rcn][bbox=5.5,52.0,6.3,52.3]) 
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 lambertus lambertus 16397318 Sep 11 09:14 data.osm.5 
> (wget 
> http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/relation[bbox=5.5,52.0,6.3,52.3][network=rcn]) 
>
>
> The one that was downloaded half an hour later is a bit smaller to my 
> surprise. I tried to find out what was the difference but visually 
> there are no changes to spot, but diff outputs so much that I don't 
> know what to do with it.
>
> 80n wrote:
>> I've found a bug and fixed it.  Can you try again and let me know how 
>> it goes?
>>
>> 80n
>>
>>