[OSM-talk] YOURS now supports route using only cycleroutes - Update

[Lambertus]

Gosmore apparently has a rule that says you can't cycle over trunk ways 
unless you say (map) so. See:

Cycle: 
<http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/%7Elambertus/routing-world/?flat=51.442294&flon=-0.084612&tlat=51.440515&tlon=-0.088474&v=bicycle&fast=1&layer=mapnik>
Car: 
<http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/%7Elambertus/routing-world/?flat=51.442294&flon=-0.084612&tlat=51.440515&tlon=-0.088474&v=motorcar&fast=1&layer=mapnik>

This is the reason that you can't get the cycle route/network layer to 
route from start to finish because it only has the cycle route ways and 
not the ways that are used in the example above:
<http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/%7Elambertus/routing-world/?flat=51.442294&flon=-0.084612&tlat=51.440515&tlon=-0.088474&v=bicycle&fast=1&layer=cn>

There are a number of solutions to this problem:
1 Change the way Gosmore behaves and allow cyclists on trunk roads by 
default
2 Add bicycle=yes to trunk roads where cycling is allowed
3 Manipulate the data that goes into the Gosmore cycle route db by 
adding bicycle=yes to all roads (because they are a member of a cycle route)

But this touches, again, the discussion in the earlier routing thread in 
this ML about whether or not default rules should be assumed and if they 
apply per country or worldwide or that all rules should always be applied.

Short term solution would be either 1 or 3. I haven't decided yet on 
which...

Shaun McDonald wrote:
> Shaun McDonald wrote:
>>     
> Further to this, I cannot seem to be able to route over trunk roads.
>
> Take for example
>
> http://openstreetmap.org/browse/way/8131748 and
> http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/~lambertus/routing-world/?flat=51.440396&flon=-0.088604&tlat=51.442837&tlon=-0.084677&v=bicycle&fast=0&layer=cn
>
> Is this intentional?
>
> Shaun