[OSM-talk] NoName
Gervase Markham
gerv-gmane at gerv.net
Mon Sep 15 13:52:05 BST 2008
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> The absence of a name property from an object is not generally
> significant (how many of our objects have a name - probably less than
> 5%). Those that don't have a name simply don't have a name and it works
> well for editors and renderers alike; nobody has ever even thought of
> issuing all of them with a special tag documenting the absence of a name.
>
> The absence of a name becomes only significant in the context of a
> certain check we run on our data, which operates on the assumption that
> roads of a certain kind usually bear a name.
I agree that the absence of a name is only significant in certain
contexts for certain types of object - primarily roads. But I don't
think it's just about "tests" - is the noname map a "test"?
The fact that this is mostly only a problem for names, and mostly only a
problem for roads, makes me think that we have to look carefully at the
trade-offs between a specific solution such as "noname=yes" and a more
complex, general solution such as "test_ignore=name_present" which, you
will have to admit, is not as obvious a tagging scheme!
But still, if people are going to object to name=none, and think
noname=yes is too specific, then I'd much rather have this than nothing.
Gerv
More information about the talk
mailing list