[OSM-talk] Parking aisle as boundary of car park not showing

80n 80n80n at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 18:07:36 BST 2008


On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Steve Chilton <S.L.Chilton at mdx.ac.uk>wrote:

> Mapnik doesn't recognise dual tags. In this case the area tag takes
> precedence. Separate polygon is the way to get it to show.
>

Isn't that tagging for the renderer?



>
> Cheers
> STEVE
>
> Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow
> Manager of e-Learning Academic Development
> Centre for Learning and Quality Enhancement
> Middlesex University
> phone/fax: 020 8411 5355
> email: steve8 at mdx.ac.uk
> http://www.mdx.ac.uk/schools/hssc/staff/profiles/technical/chiltons.asp
>
> Chair of the Society of Cartographers: http://www.soc.org.uk/
>
> SoC conference 2008:
> http://www.abdn.ac.uk/cartographers08/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Ed Loach
> Sent: 24 September 2008 16:12
> To: 'LeedsTracker'; talk at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Parking aisle as boundary of car park not
> showing
>
> > The boundary road is marked
> > highway=service
> > service=parking_aisle
> > amenity=parking
> > abutters=retail
>
> Whenever I've mapped car parks I've kept the area defined as
> amenity=parking as a separate polygon from any highway=service that
> may run around the outside of it. Map Features suggests that
> amenity=parking is a tag for nodes and/or areas, and that
> highway=service is a tag for ways. That Tiles at Home seems to cope
> doesn't necessarily mean that Mapnik can handle the dual tags.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080924/656ba0e1/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list