[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[Aun Johnsen (via Webmail)]

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:33:53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/7/31 John Smith <delta_foxtrot at yahoo.com>:
>> Some of us are in Australia and there will only be one sign posted in
>> Australia which is the legal height, but the person you are responding
to
>> is in Brazil and you said none for South America so that answers that I
>> guess.
> 
> there were no occurrences by 23th of July 2009, maybe in the meantime
> someone added one or two ;-). I added the word "legal" to the
> maxheight definition and ask anyone interested and familiar with those
> additional physical-height-signs to set up a page (might contain an
> explanatory photo, but his could also be added later). Can be also
> very short, but I don't want to loose the outcome of this discussion
> as often happens in OSM.
> 
>
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Key:maxheight:physical&action=edit&redlink=1
> 
> cheers,
> Martin
> 
Two reasons I have not made a description of Key:maxheight:physical yet

1) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/clearance My
proposal page, I'll let that process go, with input bouth from the wiki and
the mailing list
2) I am stuck at work for another 4 weeks with a slow, unreliable, and
limited internet connection, so my time on internet is very limited

When the process is completed, I will also make brazilian translations of
Key:makheight any variation of maxheight that will be implemented.
-- 
Brgds
Aun Johnsen
via Webmail