[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - 4wd_only

[Jonathan Bennett]

Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Lester Caine<lester at lsces.co.uk> wrote:
>> High ground clearance required?
>> ...So 4WD_Only is not really the correct terminology
>> and does not clearly identify the problem? IS it ground clearance, deep fords,
>> mud or poor traction conditions ...
> 
> The sign says "4WD ONLY" - I therefore suggest that 4wd_only is indeed
> the correct terminology, at least in regions (e.g. Australia) where
> the sign appears as such and the phrase is in common use.

WHS -- it meets the guidelines of being verifiable, by being what's on
the ground. If it were based on one mapper's judgement, that would be
different, but this is unambiguous.

-- 
Jonathan (Jonobennett)