[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[John Smith]

--- On Mon, 10/8/09, Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com> wrote:

> The English-language page suffered from enthusiastic
> editing by people who thought path might lead to
> footway/cycleway ceasing to be required (unlikely). And the
> result does need tidying up.

This came up on talk-au list, also with no definite agreement.

Although that was mostly about path v cycleway, but there are signs depicting bicycles on cycleways. :)