[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
Ulf Möller
usenet at ulfm.de
Mon Aug 10 12:14:59 BST 2009
John Smith schrieb:
> That isn't the case in other places, in some states of Australia you are allowed to cycle on foot paths, but the primary purpose is for pedestrians and they have right of way over cyclists.
foot=designated, bicycle=yes
> In other areas there are cycle paths and pedestrians are allowed but they aren't the primary users intended to use the way and cyclists mostly use them. So yes there would be information lost by simplifying things in the way you describe.
bicycle=designated, foot=yes
No information lost there...
More information about the talk
mailing list