[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

Nop ekkehart at gmx.de
Mon Aug 10 14:40:42 BST 2009


Hi!

Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
> the same thing that people wanted to achieve with path (expressing the
> official designation) can be achieved with those
> foot-/cycle-/bridleway by adding supplementory tags like
> xy=designated, xy=official. Therefore I would consider the introdution
> of path a bad decision.

Then you are still missing a tag for the general purpose path where you 
don't know any more details except it is not a road.

bye
	Nop





More information about the talk mailing list