[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
Alex Mauer
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Tue Aug 11 01:55:12 BST 2009
On 08/10/2009 07:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> highway=cycleway
> foot=official
>
> that latter was introduced (probably by the same people that already
> forced path)
Nope. Cbm and I were the ones behind highway=path, as you can see from
the wiki. Access=official has nothing to do with me. I agree that it's
redundant -- it seems like it's just a combination of
travelmode=designated and access=no.
Not sure how you think path was "forced" though. It had 34 votes, 22
for and 9 against (3 abstain). Nobody forced anything, we just used the
standard procedure.
-Alex Mauer "hawke"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090810/286b1162/attachment.pgp>
More information about the talk
mailing list