[OSM-talk] radioactivity
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 17:24:03 BST 2009
2009/8/11 Paul Houle <paul at ontology2.com>:
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> The waste issue is complex, but I can tell you one thing. The current
> LWR extracts only 2% of the energy in it's fuel. Future reactors could
> extract much more of that: there's enough energy sitting in the spent fuel
> system in the US to power the country for centuries: a closed fuel cycle
> could put a stop to Uranium mining for generations. Yes, the technology
> isn't there yet, but we've still got decades to develop it.
why should we (or you) focus on the development of an
industry-scale-technology with high potential risk, if the sun sends
far more energy for free than we need, without either the risk of a
MCA nor the waste-problem, which also scales much better (less
dependance from big industries and the risk that they set profit
before safety) and offers the possibility of decentralized energy
production? The only reason I see are lobbyists ;-)
cheers,
Martin
More information about the talk
mailing list