[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[Gustav Foseid]

2009/8/11 Nop <ekkehart at gmx.de>

> This is a rather lenient definition that is unsuitable to depict the
> German use case. That is exactly the reason for the confusion we are
> having. If something is tagged as a cycleway and I am planning to walk
> on foot, I need to know whether it is an unsigned way assumed to be
> suitable for cycling (then I may use it as a pedestrian) or whether it
> is legally dedicated to cycling (then I must not use it as a pedestrian).


highway=cycleway, foot=yes vs highway=cycleway, foot=no?

 - Gustav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090811/163c7ddf/attachment.html>