[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

John Smith delta_foxtrot at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 12 08:55:10 BST 2009


--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Nop <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:

> Well basically your approach is a variant of the path+acess
> tags. You 
> just leave cycleway alone and use it like path, expressing
> all the 
> important information in access tags. This is a possible
> way to go if we 
> can achieve consent on it, especially on the new tag
> "offical" which is 
> required to express the legal road-signed status.

No it's not, use bicycle=designated like someone else suggested for indicating explicitly what is on a sign, bicycle=yes if it's suitable/allowed etc.


      




More information about the talk mailing list