[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
John Smith
delta_foxtrot at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 12 08:55:10 BST 2009
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Nop <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:
> Well basically your approach is a variant of the path+acess
> tags. You
> just leave cycleway alone and use it like path, expressing
> all the
> important information in access tags. This is a possible
> way to go if we
> can achieve consent on it, especially on the new tag
> "offical" which is
> required to express the legal road-signed status.
No it's not, use bicycle=designated like someone else suggested for indicating explicitly what is on a sign, bicycle=yes if it's suitable/allowed etc.
More information about the talk
mailing list