[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[Shaun McDonald]

On 12 Aug 2009, at 10:51, Liz wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>> No. You should use highway=cycleway;bicycle=no if you have a cycle
>> path that you cannot walk on. Routing software already supports this.
>> They don't support routing cyclists over the highway=path. Are you
>> really trying to force cyclists on to major roads?
>
>
> Shaun is what you typed actually what you meant?
> highway=cycleway;pedestrian=no ???
>

Doh, not quite. I meant highway=cycleway;foot=no.

At least I know someone is paying attention ;-)

Shaun

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2433 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090812/f05f1646/attachment.bin>